ManufacturingRubber ProductsFixed AssetsIFRS

Ghost Asset Elimination and Full FAR Cleansing for a Global Rubber Products Manufacturer — Multi-Site Indonesia Verification

JCSS Indonesia conducted a comprehensive multi-site fixed asset register verification and cleansing for a global rubber and polymer products manufacturer across three Indonesian factory locations — identifying ghost assets, flagging impairment indicators under PSAK 236, correcting insurance under-coverage, and delivering audit-grade evidence accepted by the parent group's international auditors.

The Challenge

For capital-intensive manufacturing operations, the fixed asset register (FAR) is one of the most consequential — and most commonly neglected — financial records. At the global rubber manufacturer's Indonesian factories, the FAR had not been subject to independent physical verification in over three years. The result: a register that no longer reflected physical reality.

ChallengeOperational RealityBusiness Risk
Unverified FAR for 3+ yearsAsset register not reconciled to physical plant since 2021Material misstatement risk in balance sheet; external auditor unable to place reliance on asset balances
Ghost assetsFully depreciated machinery and equipment physically removed or scrapped — but still active in ERPBalance sheet overstated; ongoing depreciation charges distorting P&L
Multi-site coordinationThree factory locations required simultaneous verification to meet group audit timelineSequential verification would miss inter-site asset transfers occurring during count window
Impairment indicators unassessedSeveral production lines partially idled due to demand changes; no formal impairment review conductedPSAK 236 (formerly PSAK 48) requires impairment testing when indicators present — non-compliance risk
Insurance under-coverageInsured asset values not updated since 2019; replacement costs have risen materiallyCatastrophic underinsurance in the event of fire, flood, or natural disaster at factory

Our Approach

  1. 1

    Pre-Verification Scope Agreement

    Aligned verification procedures with both the Indonesian KAP and the parent group's international auditors; agreed evidence standards, count sheet format, photographic documentation requirements, and reporting template for group audit file.

  2. 2

    Simultaneous Multi-Site Deployment

    Deployed independent JCSS Indonesia verification teams to all three factory locations on the same day; established a strict movement freeze (no inter-site transfers during count window); completed full physical count within a 3-day window.

  3. 3

    Asset-by-Asset Physical Reconciliation

    Compared each physically verified asset to the FAR and GL: confirmed existence, recorded physical location, captured asset condition (serviceable / needs maintenance / impaired / to be disposed), and cross-referenced asset plate numbers to ERP asset codes.

  4. 4

    Ghost Asset and Addition Identification

    Systematically identified: assets on FAR not physically found (ghost assets — flagged for write-off); assets physically present but not in FAR (unrecorded additions — flagged for capitalization); and assets in wrong cost center or location in ERP.

  5. 5

    Impairment Assessment and Insurance Review

    For idled production lines and damaged equipment: prepared PSAK 236 impairment indicator documentation and referred to management for formal recoverable amount testing; independently estimated replacement cost for all major asset categories and compared to current insured values.

Outcomes

ResultMetricStrategic Impact
Ghost assets eliminatedMultiple assets removedBalance sheet corrected; future depreciation charge right-sized; P&L distortion removed
Unrecorded assets capitalizedNew assets added to FARBalance sheet more complete; depreciation coverage now correct going forward
Impairment indicators2 production lines referredManagement aware of impairment exposure before audit; provision decision made proactively
Group audit relianceJCSS report acceptedNo duplicate testing by overseas auditors required; audit completed on schedule
Insurance gap remediatedMaterial under-coverage correctedFactory assets now adequately insured against fire, flood, and natural disaster

Frameworks Applied

SAK Indonesia PSAK 216 (Aset Tetap)PSAK 236 (Penurunan Nilai)IFRS IAS 16IAS 36IIA Physical Verification StandardsGroup Audit Reliance ProtocolGhost Asset Identification MethodologyInsurance Adequacy Assessment
Get started

Ready to talk Indonesia compliance?

Partner-led response within one business day. NDA available on request.

Book a Consultation